In the post, the public affairs officer accused the article of being a “deliberate misrepresentation of the facts.”
To research the article, between 3rd January and 1st February 2017, I exchanged 22 emails with Deputy Director, Public Affairs USFJ, Major John Severns, to provide him with the opportunity to clarify the details raised in the upcoming story.
In these exchanges, Severns made contradictory statements. First, he asserted that “The on-base DUI rate is too low for us to draw any meaningful statistical observations” - before admitting USFJ does not keep tallies of the numbers of those caught driving under the influence. When asked to support another claim he’d made in his emails regarding an article published by his office, Severns claimed it “may have simply been an error.”
In the USFJ rebuttal, the author implies I was provided with a copy of a “signed, lawful order distributed by the Commander of USFJ.” On 31 January, I asked Severns to provide me with a full copy of the relevant document but he declined, opting to send a partial screenshot - the context of which was unclear and impossible to verify.
For decades, USFJ has been allowing service members to drive within its bases at a level of intoxication considered a crime on the other side of the fence. Following off-base incidents in which local nationals were injured or killed by drunk-driving SOFA personnel, USFJ repeatedly pledged to do more to reduce such accidents - all the while allowing these BAC double-standards to persist.
The Japan Times article lifted the lid on this hypocrisy and offered USFJ an opportunity to adopt an honest approach with the Japanese public; instead, as its Facebook posting shows, it decided to layer more deception around an urgent issue which has already ruined too many Japanese and American lives.